MBH more multimodal than hoped/expected. Is that because of approximated waveforms? Lang/Hughes picture of shrinking error boxes is less rosy with multiple error boxes; spin modulations may mask orbital modulations
frequency annealing may suffer from more maxima, and may risk locking into wrong one; compare to real LISA localization
try to get nice maps for proceedings
discrepancy between 3.2 SNR evaluations explained by different Galaxy models
could try using the real Galaxy background put into 3.2; but even then the noise is not stationary because of Galaxy vs. LISA orientation
should keep official S_n to do SNRs; little sensitivity to integration limits
for EMRIs, better understanding of where degeneracies are helped
also SNR is better distributed along the year, helping localization, whereas final SMBH burst is quite degenerate
but other EMRI parameters have larger degeneracies
cosmic-string analysis was very effective for all groups; have analytical understanding of degeneracies
problem may be more challenging in the presence of MBH signals, and glitches
for 3.5, have two reports; together they give a consistent story